FL24M
Member
Posts: 130
|
From what I understand, this will soon be available to the mass public and will allow people to search the entire internet for images of anyone whose face can be recognized. This is great news for cuckold! Some may be scared, but just think of it....your wive's co-workers uploading her face pic on their computers during their lunch break and what do we have here???
|
Page666
Member
Posts: 97
|
There already is something but it's not comprehensive. Use "tineye". It scans the internet for a specific photo. I.e., you have a photo, and Tineye finds if it's posted anywhere. Growing by leaps and bounds daily. a Superior's satisfaction, lust, enjoyment count for all. A cuck's sexual orientation, "needs", for nothing.
|
castrated
Member
Posts: 90
|
what you understand is wrong
this tech is already available with all the other tech's of this kind of recognizing but will never be available as it will concern privacy
in the age when facebook privacy is the main topic of consumers rights in tech arena,this type of this will ever arrive.at most the kind google has right now but thats all
if this thing comes,there will be mass panic and people will stop posting pics which will fuck the internet boom and companies surely don't want that
|
Page666
Member
Posts: 97
|
There already is the beginning of this sort of thing. Try "tineye" and others and you'll find out they work! My dungeon photos, wife photos a Superior's satisfaction, lust, enjoyment count for all. A cuck's sexual orientation, "needs", for nothing.
|
IndianaCuck2
Member
Posts: 27
|
Face recognition is really easy to defeat thru simple ways and is very far from primetime. Also have to guess that "tineye" is doing more image CRC checking than real validation, just like Digimarc and others have tried for years.
You have nothing to fear...
|
peter50
Member
Posts: 61
|
I think that some of you guys are wrong. I have read an article stating that the tests with face recognition have shown it to work in aboutone third of the cases. So if you submit a photo of your wife, there is a likelyhood of about 33% that the program will find another photo of her already existing on the internet. And thats not bad!
|
hotcplindc
Member
Posts: 781
|
Peter, just a few thoughts: "I read an article" is, in this day and age, not much more credible than "I heard down at the the bar..." or "I read on the wall in the bathroom stall..." Articles ~can~ be good, but just "an article" is useless. And your logic on the percentage is flawed. If FR software is about 33% accurate, that suggests that if there are 100 pictures of your wife's face online, it'll find about 33 of them. There is ~not~ a "liklihood of about 33% that the program will find another photo of her already existing on the internet" unless someone has posted them there! And, to date, FR software generally require passport-like pics (full-frontal, no glasses, and ears fully exposed) to function properly...
But other posters are right; while this software being available may titillate some, it'll encourage others to be much more cautious about sharing face pics...
Irie all!
|