MrBigCuckold
Admin
Posts: 5837
|
Quoting: subwm Thanks for sorting the site out, MBC. It seems to be working fine now. cheers
|
submisboi
Member
Posts: 650
|
i love this site, thank you very much. but please check out lacucks pics he posted on pumpboys caption thread, how old can they possibly be?
|
jimmy7ball
Member
Posts: 129
|
yes submisboi is right please remove no one wants to see that kind of stuff.. keep up the good work mrbigcuckold thanks in advance
|
lacuck
Member
Posts: 161
|
Quoting: submisboi i love this site, thank you very much. but please check out lacucks pics he posted on pumpboys caption thread, how old can they possibly be? Don't be an idiot. They are fully clothed, you moron. If you think that fully clothed pictures of 17 years olds are now illegal? You better burn all your Sears catalogs. Sounds to me like you guys are pedophobes. Sue you don't have a problem there?
|
MrBigCuckold
Admin
Posts: 5837
|
Quoting: lacuck Don't be an idiot. They are fully clothed, you moron. If you think that fully clothed pictures of 17 years olds are now illegal? You better burn all your Sears catalogs. Sounds to me like you guys are pedophobes. Sue you don't have a problem there? yes, this is now illegal. this is a kids erotica. ps: God Bless America!
|
submisboi
Member
Posts: 650
|
i think your words have proven who is an idiot. so sorry for stomping on your pedohile rights, i didn't know cuckolds brownie had rights. those were real girls compromised into sexually provocative poses for one reamister only, clothes or no clothes this was not the sears catalogue and those girls were alot younger than 17.
|
submisboi
Member
Posts: 650
|
and ya i forgot, this probably puts the site at risk too, thanks mr. big
|
lacuck
Member
Posts: 161
|
Who said anything about 'pedophile rights'? You are just trying to make a straw man argument.
No picture was in a 'sexual pose' and they were not only all fully clothed but the only skin showing where their arms and legs from the knees down. And there was no caption attached to them or anything suggesting anything sexual in nature.
The problem, obviously, is in your mind, not in the pictures. They were as mild as any billboard, TV commercial, or Sears catalog.
When someone overreacts to such mild pictures the way you do, it's obvious that the problem is in you. The word pedophobe comes to mind.
|
MrBigCuckold
Admin
Posts: 5837
|
Quoting: lacuck Who said anything about 'pedophile rights'? You are just trying to make a straw man argument. No picture was in a 'sexual pose' and they were not only all fully clothed but the only skin showing where their arms and legs from the knees down. And there was no caption attached to them or anything suggesting anything sexual in nature. The problem, obviously, is in your mind, not in the pictures. They were as mild as any billboard, TV commercial, or Sears catalog. When someone overreacts to such mild pictures the way you do, it's obvious that the problem is in you. The word pedophobe comes to mind. Problems are in the mind who lobby the US laws. Online porn is the very thin industry, so if you see the kids exploitation at TV or somewhere else it's seems more inoffensively if you see the kids exploitation (not the sex exploitation) in the porn, so the online porn industry (sponsors, hosters, payment systems, content makers etc...) is through bigger press under laws such other entertainment industries. And I wish to run cuckoldplace without any problems from hosters and sponsors. peace, MBC
|
submisboi
Member
Posts: 650
|
i don't think lacuck get's the point here. but i'm not going to bother with this discussion anymore, it seems pointless. but if i see anymore preteen girl photos on this site Mr B i'll let you know. peace
|
jamesriske
Member
Posts: 1095
|
It's not that the pics were illegal at all, it's just that people freak out when they see sexy teenagers on a forum that is mainly for sex fantasies. So it's best to leave them off, lacuck.
Permisterally, I've fucked plenty of teen girls when I travel to other areas where the age of consent is much lower (before the recent 'travel for sex laws were enacted) and had a great time and so did they.
But the U.S. is one of the most sexually-repressed countries in the world and unfortunately, the most powerful. So we all have to bow to it's religious bullcuckolds brownie.
PEACE, lacuck, if Mr. Big gets complaints, the hosts just shut it down whether it's legal or not.
|
lacuck
Member
Posts: 161
|
ok ok! I will cool it. But the pics were fully clothed and clearly not even close to being illegal. GEEZE.
I agree that the two people freaking out and complaining about them are probably pedophobes. Permisterally, I'm not offended nor do I react with disgust or horror when I see a picture of a 15 year old in a swimsuit. In fact, I think people who do have serious problems in that area.
But ok, I will cool it - no more young pics.
|
dncr499
Anonymous
|
MrBigCuckold
I want to draw your attention to a post
|
MrBigCuckold
Admin
Posts: 5837
|
dncr499thank you for report i had check this video. it's ok
|
babbionz
Member
Posts: 586
|
|
MrBigCuckold
Admin
Posts: 5837
|
thank you very much topic deleted, topicstarter got notice not to post such posts
|
luceiia
Member
Posts: 349
|
|
Kaegos_whm
Member
Posts: 1
|
Spambots just his the XXX Videos board hard.. It skyrocketed to 208 pages, I couldn't link you to them all if I tried. Just go in there, theres thousands of them, alot of them are the ones with 0 replies (although there'll be some legit ones in there too).
|
MrBigCuckold
Admin
Posts: 5837
|
Kaegos_whm pls just post here some examples
|
blackhorn
Member
Posts: 51
|
This guy vanilla thrilla keeps flaming left right and centre - made threats to a guy called stinky in the thread called vanilla thrilla AND most of all keeps advertising that DC place at every single given opportunity - does that count as SPAM?
|
MrBigCuckold
Admin
Posts: 5837
|
vanilla_thrilla pls post some samples of your videos, it's really seems like you try to post the videos that you are not own
|
nailhead1964
Member
Posts: 285
|
Quoting: MrBigCuckold vanilla_thrilla pls post some samples of your videos, it's really seems like you try to post the videos that you are not own Thank you "Boss man"!...As you can tell from his comments,that he's a fraud and a cuckolds brownie mixer....Tired of his pryin' contradictions and lies...You will notice that he will never go away,despite completely insulting this great site....Go figure.... "Nice asses only,please"
|
nailhead1964
Member
Posts: 285
|
Quoting: vanilla_thrilla I have never insulted this site nor do I lie. Now i'm no attorney in a court of law here,but come on man............"Attention jury!"...........I will repeat a Vanilla_thrilla posted quote.Timed,...18:13:56......Date,...18 Oct. 2007, from Vanilla_Thrilla thread........."It's a lame imitaion at best"(refering to this site compared to Dark Cavern)..........What do they say?...Oh yeah,....."I rest my case".. "Nice asses only,please"
|
submisboi
Member
Posts: 650
|
even though interracial is prob my fave, for me it's not the only thing i'm into. this site is much more free to attract people into all different areas of cuckolding and s&m, the other site is exclusively ir. the captions forum was what initially brought me here, they don't even have one over there. and the layout here is awesome, so much brighter and easier to navigate around. dark cavern is good, but my opinion is this place is better. my two cents for ya.
|
nailhead1964
Member
Posts: 285
|
Quoting: vanilla_thrilla But it's like comparing Spud Webb to Michael Jordan Well to be honest,i know as much about Dark Cavern(did not go inside since there is a charge)as i do basketball.........Zip.......However,the opinion stated above by submisboi,...seems to be frequent here among many.... "Nice asses only,please"
|
MrBigCuckold
Admin
Posts: 5837
|
vanilla_thrilla
the last change to show the samples. pls be serious
|
joranc
Member
Posts: 762
|
#237 · Edited by: joranc
|
|
dont you think its getting a tad out of proportion????? this admonition is confusing .... objecting the irrational ,mentaly unrefined and constricted with the equaly cognitivly deluded ...... this persecution of the wicked is not progressive the threats were a disappointment,yes ... and they were threats Vnil...however...this stipulation to substantiate veracity conveys a tinge of hypocrisy i feel what i find most disturbing is the lack of a healthy dis-belief suspension reqired from the so called super educated adults in a comunity such as this ..... anyway.... i am niether judge nor jury here
|
joranc
Member
Posts: 762
|
......such as it is.... ha
|
submisboi
Member
Posts: 650
|
#239 · Edited by: submisboi
|
|
way too easy, i'll just keep quiet.
|
joranc
Member
Posts: 762
|
submisboii agree wth ur earlier statmnt.. the diversity here is a big prt of what makes this site incomparable i 2 will now be silent
|